🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the Britain, and it seems it’s time for a rethink. Over the years, an event that began as a commemorative event of the past, cultural identity and bonds between international African diaspora communities, has taken on a corporate feel, expanding to include functions where African descendants are remunerated to talk to Caucasian groups about implicit prejudice and supportive partnership. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade generated a rise in the business of displaying cultural sensitivity. But even that moment has passed. The wave has reached its height, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what raising awareness is for.

The History of Black History Observance

Initially celebrated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was established in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of celebration and reflection in the February's second week. Black History Month grew out of this movement and was officially launched in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the United States and Canada in winter, but also in October in the UK, the Federal Republic of Germany, Éire and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The month has developed since those days, giving reduced attention to the narratives of the slave trade across the Atlantic and fights for racial justice, and more on notable African descendants in politics, culture, and activism, and broadly celebrating the input Black people have made to mold society. It is in schools where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with lectures and artistic activities. But the manner the month is observed is a reflection of the contemporary political context. How it evolves is a valuable example in how appropriation leads to erosion: the reshaping of Black History Month has hindered the point of it, which is to tackle structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Jarring Moment

Little demonstrates how crucial it is to reevaluate Black History Month more than the specific period in which it occurs this year. In the United Kingdom, a reemerging right-wing in the shape of the Reform party is leading the polls. In the recent season we saw the largest far-right rally in British history. the Conservative leader, the person of color at the helm of the Tory party, is a firm opponent of anti-racism activism, and we are in a situation where a legislator feels empowered to say that “not seeing any white faces” in specific city neighborhoods is a cause for alarm. Simultaneously, extreme conservative groups are surging in the EU as a entirety.

In the America, a significant offensive against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been carried, often successfully, to the top legal institutions of the country. A campaign to erase the history of people of color and experience from the records is ongoing. One of the former president's early administrative commands aimed at the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the Smithsonian Institution, alleging that they of a organized and extensive campaign to alter the country's historical narrative” by portraying America “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

In this context, the month represents how minimally it can be impactful if it is restricted to either obligatory business commemorations, or politically neutered commemorations of former accomplishments, rather than confronting the conditions of the contemporary world. It also reveals how its short period means that it is disconnected from the broader ongoing work that is necessary. An academic expert, a educator at University of Greenwich, articulated it most accurately when she raised concerns about the temporary “tokenism” of the observance. “The problem with embracing a superficial method”, she stated, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month becomes a fleeting performance rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Determining how to adjust, modify and expand initiatives for fair treatment and appreciation in such moments of dejection and worry is a challenging endeavor. There is a temptation to just do away with things like Black History Month altogether, believing they are no longer suitable, or are vestiges of an period that has been ineffective.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and tradition of racial movements – local anti-racism groups, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and indeed, including corporate presentations – represent an infrastructure that a considerable labor has gone into. It is there not merely to decline as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month appear as? To begin with, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is distributed across all seasons (as certain organizations are already starting to implement), elements of its material (particularly around historic Black characters) incorporated into school curriculums. It would also be a era that does not shy away from political issues, and provides room for people, particularly youth, to share their anxieties and narratives. What value has simple recognition of the past when it fails to address the present reality of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the street? Establishments who observe it should not be comforted with the non-confrontational words of implicit prejudice and sensitivity to minor insults, but challenged by the risks that impact society if opposition to discrimination is not taken seriously. To summarize, Black History Month should be made current, critical, and reactive. It could be that an total re-identification is in order – Black History is Now Month.